Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Ive said before that the Church Fathers are unanimous in their belief in regenerative baptism: that is, they believe that Baptism actually saves us (as 1 Peter 3:21 explicitly says), by causing us to be born again by water and the Spirit; that it actually washes away our sins, and creates in us a clean heart, enabling us to approach God all of which is prophesied by Ezekiel. Its because of this belief that the Church permits infant baptism: baptism isnt some good work that we do for God, showing Him how truly Christian we are; its a Sacrament, meaning that its something that He does for us, cleansing us from our sins.
So while Scripture is totally silent on the direct question of infant baptism, the Scriptural teaching on regenerative baptism settles the question. If baptism is something God does for us, and if it incorporates us into the Kingdom, and if Christ says to let the little children come unto Him, then its clear that we should permit infants to be baptized, and in fact, should encourage it to remove original sin.
Several things are wrong with this claim. First, Tertullian doesnt reject the practice of infant baptism. He discourages it, but he doesnt forbid it (thats an important distinction, since it shows he viewed as possible). Second, his basis for discouraging it isnt because the young children dont know Christ. Its because hes concerned that once theyre baptized, theyll be damned forever if they fall into mortal sin. To understand why he was concerned about this, you need to know something about the controversy giving rise to a heresy called Novatianism.
As the above commenter rightly points out in the second half of his comment, there was an open theological question in the early Church about whether or not post-baptismal mortal sins could be forgiven. This was due in no small part about an interpretative dispute about Hebrews 6:4-6, which says: For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, if they then commit apostasy, since they crucify the Son of God on their own account and hold him up to contempt.
The references to being enlightened, tasting the heavenly gift, and becoming partakers of the Holy Spirit are references to Baptism, Communion, and Confirmation respectively. These are the three Sacraments of initiation, by which one becomes a fully-incorporated member of the Church, the Body of Christ.
Given this, can Christians who fall into mortal sin ever be saved? Certain Christians said no, based on their reading of Hebrews 6:4-6 and a few other passages. Others said yes, since nothing is impossible to God. This dispute eventually exploded into a heretical movement called the Novatians, who denied penance to mortal sinners, who were opposed (ultimately successfully) by the Catholics. St. Ambroses book Concerning Repentance does a good job refuting the Novatian arguments. He points out that in trying to affirm the workings of grace in the Sacraments, the Novatians were actually demeaning them, by treating the Sacrament of Penance as powerless. In Book II, Chapter 2, he shows why the Novatian interpretation of Hebrews 6 is wrong.
But while Tertullian was alive, this dispute was still young, and the position that the Novatians would later hold wasnt obviously heretical. There were still open questions about whether Hebrews 6 permitted reconciliation for a baptized Christian who commit a mortal sin. Moreover, penances during this period were quite severe, sometimes lasting an entire lifetime. Given all this, its perhaps unsurprising that even many orthodox Christians put off getting baptized, often until their deathbeds.
Trying to turn Tertullian into a proto-Protestant on the question of Baptism is particularly ironic, given that the very first words of On Baptism are Happy is our sacrament of water, in that, by washing away the sins of our early blindness, we are set free and admitted into eternal life!
That is, the entire work begins from the position that Baptism is regenerative. None of Tertullians arguments make sense without that framework. Hes not arguing for a believers baptism or anything remotely close. Quite the opposite. The Catholic position holds that Baptism washes away sins, which Protestants typically deny. But Tertullian doesnt just hold to the Catholic position, he goes much further (too far, even), arguing that only Baptism washes away mortal sins. He literally couldnt be further from the standard Protestant view on this doctrine.
Step back, and a jarring picture emerges. Heres a dispute in the early Church over whether to baptize right away, or whether to wait. But whats noteworthy is that nobody holds to the Protestant view. Nobody says that baptism is just an expression or symbol of our faith. Nobody is denying that Baptism is regenerative: in fact, the whole dispute only makes sense if you realize that both sides firmly believe in baptismal regeneration. Furthermore, neither side is denying that infant baptism is permissible: that whole sub-argument turns on whether or not its a good idea.
All of this shows how radically Protestantism broke with early Christianity: theres no way to read Protestantism back into the story of the Church without seriously perverting the historical data.
Finally, an ironic point. On the actual dispute between the Catholics and Novatians, Protestants agree with us (or at least, agree with us more than they do the Novatians). Typically, Protestantism doesnt have any concept of venial v. mortal sins, or any way to distinguish between the sort of sins that believers commit every day from the sort of sins that cut us off from the Body of Christ. But they do believe that, even if you fall away at some point in your life, its still possible for you to be ultimately saved. So again, citing to someone closer to the Novatian camp to support the Protestant position is an ironic sort of historical eisegesis.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.