Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Introduction
Harm reduction, sometimes known as harm minimization, refers to a set of public health policies meant to minimize the adverse social and severe effects linked with various human actions, including those that are legal and prohibited. It entails interventions that try to lessen the negative consequences of harmful behaviors. Harm minimization is a concept that is most commonly connected with the use of substances. However, it may be used in any decision associated with negative repercussions. For instance, on one end of the spectrum, harm reduction would promote needle exchange programs to lower the risk of HIV transmission. As a result, it is of the utmost importance to understand abuse reduction and its benefits and drawbacks for afflicted people.
Discussion
Programs such as the exchange of used needles with clean ones are among the most frequent types of damage reduction. It helps prevent the spread of infections transmitted through blood (Ashford et al., 2018). Another standard method of reducing harm is the use of opioid replacement therapy (Ashford et al., 2018). Methadone maintenance is a common name for this practice. Opioid Replacement Therapy is a method of treating opioid addiction that involves providing patients with methadone or buprenorphine to help them gradually withdraw from illegal substances.
Harm minimization comes with its pros and cons, a safe supply of injectable drugs is made available to addicts through harm reduction thus decreasing the chances of infection transmission. It provides many techniques to break out of the cycle of active addiction. It allows those who are addicted to drugs to access primary drug education as well as healthcare services. Regarding naloxone and safe injection sites, the strategy results in lifesaving measures (Ashford et al., 2018). However, harm reduction mechanisms come with associated cons. It has the potential to foster addiction, it may be easier for some addicts to rely on harm curtailment strategies than to get sober (Ashford et al., 2018).
Conclusion
In conclusion, when the benefits and drawbacks of harm limiting are weighed against one another, it is evident that the programs, on the whole, appear to be successful.
Reference
Ashford, R. D., Curtis, B., & Brown, A. M. (2018). Peer-delivered harm reduction and recovery support services: Initial evaluation from a hybrid recovery community drop-in Center and Syringe Exchange Program. Harm Reduction Journal, 15(1).
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.