Category: the natural law account of reasonableness in action adequately satisfies that conception; or they can hold that the notion of morally right is so muddled that it should be jettisoned

and Suarez. It continues to be an issue between natural law theorists like Grisez (1983) and Finnis (1980) on one hand and theological voluntarists like Adams (1999) and Hare (2001) on the other. Natural law theorists have several options: they can argue against any meaningful distinction between morality and the reasonable more generally; or they…